Menu
Timewise Foundation Logo

Equity in flexible working is key for racial justice

Our study with Runnymede shows how ethnicity shapes workplace interactions and empowerment around working patterns and identifies the steps for cultural change.

By Dr Sarah Dauncey, Head of Partnerships and Insight, Timewise

Occupational segregation is a distinctive feature of the UK’s labour market and a driver of persistent inequality, in income and more widely in health. Workers from black and minoritised ethnic groups are overly represented in sectors where site-based, insecure and lower-paid work is prevalent. People from minoritised groups are also more likely to have a higher risk of developing long-term health conditions, which can affect people’s ability to work – especially in site-based and more physical roles. The pandemic exposed the health inequity arising from this, with minoritised ethnic groups disproportionately impacted because of the increased likelihood of being a frontline worker without the option to work from home.  

These patterns are too often replicated within organisations, with people from minoritised ethnic groups overrepresented in lower-paid, site-based roles and functions like security, cleaning, catering and caretaking which typically have more limited access to flexible options. Where an organisational focus is on hybrid as a flexible option, disparities are intensified. Further, within their workplaces, workers from minoritised ethnicities can experience a sense of precarity or inferiority that restricts their confidence to challenge decision-makers and request reforms to conditions or working patterns for fear of losing their job.   

This means that workers from black and minoritised communities are overall less likely to make the most of the workplace benefits that support better health. This includes the improved work-life balance that comes from better autonomy and flexibility. Unhealthy working conditions contribute to ill-health, and ill-health restricts people’s ability to work, creating a cycle that is increasingly difficult to overcome in the context of the rising cost of living. 

It’s in the context of this structural inequality that Runnymede and Timewise established a partnership, with the support of Impact on Urban Health. We wanted to better understand the relationship between flexible working and organisational approaches to equality, diversity and inclusion, and how site-based workers from black and minoritised ethnic backgrounds perceive and experience flexible working.  

More specifically, we wanted to find out how new ways of working supported or thwarted a sense of inclusion and belonging. This involved us speaking with two stakeholder groups in participating organisations, leaders of site-site based teams and their employees. We took an action-oriented approach to our research, ensuring that our insights drove meaningful change in participating organisations to address processes of exclusion.  

Racist rioting further exposes inequity for site-based workers  

The recent racist rioting, driven by a combination of routine, normalised discrimination – heated-up over recent years by mainstream politicians and media – has raised the stakes of our research and its implications for both workers and organisations. Our interviews were undertaken early in 2024. We heard workers’ sense of fear, their reluctance to ‘rock the boat’ and ask for working patterns that might challenge ‘ideal worker’ (i.e. white and male) stereotypes. People who have experienced, or are experiencing, racial trauma invariably have a different set of expectations about their level of input and control over their working pattern.  

During the riots, we read harrowing accounts in the mainstream media of people facing physical and verbal threats because of their skin colour or religion, instilling fear among people from black and ethnic minorities across the country. While we welcomed hearing about employers who led with empathy and offered increased protections to their employees, including the opportunity to work from home if they were able to, we were mindful of the risks that site-based workers had to face. Yet again, people from black and ethnic backgrounds who worked in jobs with fixed locations faced greater exposure, this time, not to disease but to an outbreak of violent racism.  

This disparity once again highlights the urgent need for employers of site-based staff to think both strategically and creatively about flexible options and how they can be used to value employees and provide work-life support. Our research shows how critically important it is for employers to be pro-active here, talking openly – to all – about available flexible options. Signposting them rather than expecting employees to have the confidence to ask for them.  

Barriers to accessing flexible working options 

Our study uncovered a complex of factors that posed barriers to site-based employees accessing flexible options. These broadly fall into three categories: operational, managerial and cultural. We found that employees’ race and ethnicity shaped their workplace interactions and expectations around working patterns and level of empowerment to pursue change. Here’s a summary of some of the main barriers that we identified. 

  • A lack of knowledge and understanding of organisational policy relating to flexible working options and employment rights among frontline employees. Corporate communication channels often presumed access to computers and email, excluding groups of workers in predominantly site-based roles. 
  • A tendency for organisations to present flexible working as synonymous with hybrid, placing undue emphasis on place-based options over time-based ones which are more relevant to employees in site-based roles. This automatically makes flexible working ‘exclusive’ to desk-based employees, creating an ‘us versus them’ dynamic.  
  • A manager lottery creating disparities in access to flexible working options. Leaders and employees recognised that some managers were ‘on board’ with flexible working and actively encouraged it, while some weren’t, leading to working cultures where people felt excluded and not trusted.  

These barriers, contributing to a diminished sense of autonomy, gave rise to frustration and personal stress among some employees – impacting on their sense of wellbeing and work-life balance. Moreover, participants recognised the connections between input and control over ways of working and organisational benefits, not just personal ones. They spoke of the gains that would flow from feeling trusted and more autonomous and empowered, such as higher levels of commitment and productivity.  

Leaders participating in the research recognised the potential of flexible working to support inclusion priorities but were alert to the realities on the ground and the effect of variations in managers’ attitudes and approaches. They were aware of a disconnect between policy and practice leading to disparities. Organisational values and commitments weren’t being evenly role modelled and applied by managers. 

So, what are the solutions to help employers navigate these challenges, improve their working cultures and deliver on equity and inclusion?   

Solutions to drive equity in access to flexible options and support inclusion 

While localised initiatives need to be tailored and based on insights and measurement, we’re pleased to share some general insights from our research to drive meaningful organisation-wide action to address workplace inequalities and call out processes of exclusion.  

  • Engage and listen to employees from minoritised ethnic groups over ways of working. The starting point for any organisation looking to step up action to address inequality and better support employees from minoritised ethnic groups is to engage and listen to them.  
  • Encourage and reward allyship in the context of ways of working so that individuals benefitting from flexible options can advocate on behalf of those without them.  
  • Align strategies on flexible working and equality. Secure executive and senior leadership alignment on the value of flexible working for the organisation and for the individual. Role model values and behaviours to foster a culture where flexibility stigma isn’t tolerated.  
  • Mainstream flexible working. Take a pro-active approach to reduce the onus on the confidence of the individual employee to ‘request’ flexible options.  
  • Experiment and measure. Place emphasis on manager confidence to trial and test new ways of working and measure outcomes. 
  • Use a variety of platforms to communicate organisational commitment and policy. Create and share case studies of people from diverse backgrounds, and in a wide range of roles, working flexibly to demonstrate what’s possible. And utilise a range of methods to reach employee groups with messaging and policies relating to ways of working. 

On-going and sustained action is required for social justice 

We’re aware that further research is needed to deepen understanding of the complexity of the challenges facing minoritised ethnic workers over accessing flexible working options. The employers who partnered with us showed bravery and commitment to tackling systemic, structural and cultural challenges. They have sustained work ahead to deliver change, but a clear sense of where they’re heading and a route to get there with accountability in place. We’re delighted to say our peer researchers have now become pivotal to holding their organisations to account on delivery equity in access to flexible options, and ultimately better health. 

Published November 2024

Other Recent Research

Share
FacebookTwitterLinkedIn